Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There clearly was a strategic leak to tmz about no money changing hands. The article has been edited since it was originally published to add the “it appears” language. [/quote] Oof. If TMZ wrote that without a leak, they could get sued. If someone actually leaked, there could be a round 2 of this. The NDAs would have teeth.[/quote] TMZ is not a party to the NDA so cannot be sued [/quote] The PP is saying that if they wrote the original statement without a leak, they could be sued for defamation by one of the parties because it's just something they made up. But if someone actually leaked, then that person could be sued and the "teeth" in the NDA probably means a huge amount of money. So either way, it was a dumb thing to print. There's evidence either way that is publicly known, and any insider info would violate the settlement agreement itself.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
