Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]That's not just a "knife" --- that's a meat cleaver! And the reporter says that BB used that meat cleaver to kill CB. So, if the reporter's retelling of what prosecutors said is accurate, prosecutors don't think CB was stabbed earlier that morning... they say that BB first shot JR, and then BB took the knife/meat cleaver that JR brought and stabbed CB in the neck. The "knife" that they show isn't the kind of sharp pointy knife that I was expecting. It's the kind of knife that you CHOP things with. Or slice things. But it's not really a stabbing-kind of "knife". It's a slitting-kind of knife. If CB was conscious when JR was shot, then maybe there was, in fact, an arrangement to play out a scene that CB knew about. (of course she didn't know that BB was actually going to use the playtime to kill two people, and she didn't know that JM would be waiting at the door with another gun). [/quote] Just because it's a slicing rather than stabbing knife doesn't mean CB agreed to any arrangement, and whether CB was conscious doesn't mean she agrees to it either. It seems pretty clear she was set up and likely both AP and BB both had guns pulled from the beginning. AP's story that BB told her to get the 2nd gun after the stabbing is likely a lie and she had it to ensure they could keep CB and JR in line while they commanded them to arrange the scene -both CB and JR under gunpoint of two people with two guns. [/quote] You are misreading my post and my point. The knife type is not the reason I said CB MAY have agreed an arrangement. How is JR IN the room with CB and CB isn't screaming that a stranger is in her house? 1. She expected him to be there? Or 2. She thought the sound of someone in the house was BB, and never saw JR until he was brought into the room at gunpoint x2 (JM and BB)? The prosecution has to lay out a series of events that explain why CB is in the room while BB puts JR in the corner on his knees and shoots him, and CB is not running out of that room. If CB didn't know anything about a meet up with JR, then JR almost certainly did NOT enter the bedroom before BB and JM arrived. In that case, both BB and JM would have had to have guns on JR and CB when they entered the bedroom or else CB would have tried to leave when BB (a stranger) was walking to the corner of her bedroom and kneeling down. 10 pages ago, I hypothesized that BB may have told JR to wait for him in the foyer before they went into the bedroom together. If that's what happened (even if it was at gunpoint), it explains why CB didn't call police about an unexpected stranger (JR) in her bedroom. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics