Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Kamala Harris for President"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Empty words. "Targeting price gouging". Solicits an emotional response. She won't do anything. The bottle of salad dressing will remain $10 until sales go down. She can't do anything.[/quote] Yes, she can, in concert with the House and Senate. Remember Schoolhouse Rock and "I'm just a bill?"[/quote] The House and the Senate are not going to pass such ridiculous legislation. [/quote] Why not? If companies are ripping off consumers to excess profit and the GOP calls that "inflation" then why shouldn't there be more regulation around it to help protect American consumers? If you don't want to be regulated, then don't take the subsidies. If you take subsidies, then expect to be regulated. Agri-business can decide which they want, but they shouldn't get both.[/quote] Ripping off? You aren't being ripped off. Don't like it, don't buy it.[/quote] Things like milk and eggs are sort of a necessity that are subsidied by the US government. Pop-tarts? Sure, I can make a decision on that if I need to.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics