Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I am not against people coming in to use the park at all. I am not even against the concept of a pool. I am hard-line opposed to encroaching in any way on the Hearst field and its surrounding trees. That must be preserved at all costs and that means no artificial turf. The pool, if needed, should have been part of the original plan when the playground was renovated. By the way, that playground is great and is well used. The little turf soccer field is used late into the night which is also great. I don't like the bright lights but they seem to be on some kind of timer. The one draw back is that there is a lot of trash from those pick-up games that doesn't get picked up and is now falling down the hill. It would be nice if the people who used the little soccer field didn't litter so much. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
