Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to ""Teacher of the Year" quits over Common Core tests"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just to show good faith: Here is a link to a K standard that a principal thinks is not clear. It doesn't happen to be one that I object to as much as some others. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2015/02/17/why-i-once-liked-common-core-but-changed-my-mind-one-principals-view/ Waiting for your post on who was in charge.[/quote] Ok, the standard is: CCSS.Math.Content.K.NBT.A.1 Compose and decompose numbers from 11 to 19 into ten ones and some further ones, e.g., by using objects or drawings, and record each composition or decomposition by a drawing or equation (such as 18 = 10 + 8); understand that these numbers are composed of ten ones and one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, or nine ones. It seems quite clear to me. According to the standard, kindergarteners should be able to show that (for example) 15 consists of ten ones plus five more ones and should be able to demonstrate this in some way, using a drawing or writing an equation. Why do you think that it's not clear? Also, is your main objection to the writing of the standard or to the content of the standard? The principle in the blog post you cite only says that the standard is "unsuitable".[/quote] This should be a 1st grade standard, not a K standard. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics