Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "James Comey Indictment"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]And in today's episode of "That Moron HAlligan Gets Punted Again", grand jury transcripts to be turned over to Comey and the defense. "For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds the record in this case requires the full disclosure of grand jury materials. In so finding, the Court recognizes this is an extraordinary remedy, but given the factually based challenges the defense has raised to the government’s conduct and the prospect that government misconduct may have tainted the grand jury proceedings, disclosure of grand jury materials under these unique circumstances is necessary to fully protect the rights of the accused. "" https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.582136/gov.uscourts.vaed.582136.191.0.pdf Eventually, I'll feel sorry for the poor woman. Eventually.[/quote] This is truly incredible. It looks like what happened here is that Lindsay took a three-count indictment to the GJ and got no-billed on one of the counts. She then created a new indictment with two counts and submitted that to the judge as the true bill indictment without ever taking it back to the GJ. And since the foreperson's signature is on the new two-count indictment, it appears she somehow forged it or did a cut and paste job from the original no-billed indictment![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics