Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My take on it is the declaration is being submitted as evidence of Sarowitz making the statement about wanting to destroy Lively. That goes to what is relevant to the motion for attorney's fees, which is that the lawsuit was filed to silence/punish someone making an accusation of SH and retaliation. The 47.1 motion I thought was fine, nothing groundbreaking there that we hadn't seen and basically what was expected, but well put together. And Lively is lucky that the Wayfarer parties, and their counsel, are extremely stupid and wrote and said a lot of things that imply the intent of the lawsuit was punitive or for PR reasons moreso than based on grounds to believe they had a winning legal case. And then I think, since that declarant was going to make a declaration about that relevant information about Sarowitz and also had negative experiences with Baldoni, they threw that irrelevant info in there, unredacted of course, just cause they could and it would make it into the press. It doesn't mean the info about Baldoni's alleged verbal abuse will make it before the jury, it was just kind of a cheap shot that Lively threw in there. I was wondering why the 47.1 motion came out now, since Lively is still collecting evidence from Wayfarer (which, we may wonder, could be some of the most damaging evidence since Wayfarer has not turned it over, so why not wait?). There was some speculation they dropped it because Eleanor the Great had its Cannes Premiere, and that seems to be as good a theory as any.[/quote] Except the TMZ piece quotes Blake’s team saying that the declarant will likely testify against Justin at trial, not Sarawitz.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics