Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous] NAG’s take on the redacted affidavit and how it demonstrates the paucity of the Lively case. First she agrees with others here no legal basis for the redaction of the declarant’s name. Second, she attacks Lively’s assertion that this person will testify at trial because evidence of “verbal abuse” on another set is not admissible. For those that aren’t lawyers, evidence intended to show propensity for an act generally is inadmissible, here the other act is not even alleged to be sh or retaliation. https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/s/hdmQjFhm0N[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
