Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm a different person who supports Lively generally (haven't posted here in several days) and I don't think the declarant is Lively, Reynolds, or Johannsen. Lively and Reynolds are stupid suggestions. Johannsen is too much star power to be doing a declaration like this, but in any case their name doesn't fit in he blank that's left for it. (And don't try to say she'd sign as Scarlett Jost: no.) My guess is a lower level producer etc. from Johannsen's movie. Or maybe someone from Will and Harper although the timing is off. I've kind of wondered whether it might be Harper, because I feel like it would be pretty easy for Baldoni to say something incredibly insensitive and wrong to Harper. [/quote] This makes sense. Regardless of who it is, it's a very bad look for Baldoni that he has this type of conflict with another person, as it does give more credence to Blake's claims and makes it less likely that she is entirely to blame for their poor working relationship. Also, depending on the timing of this other issue, I could see it contributing to Baldoni behaving poorly with Blake. If he'd recently has a conflict with another person, especially another woman, on another project, it could have put him in mindset that made it harder for him to work with. Though I am also totally baffled as to why Steve Sarowitz would choose to make that threatening comment about Blake and Ryan to someone who has already had issues with Baldoni? That's bizarre.[/quote] So is someone filing that JB also SH them? If just saying he was mean, that’s just a jerk boss but doesn’t rise to SH claim.[/quote] No it just claims verbally abusive. No SH or smear.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics