Reply to Van Hollen in El Salvador

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Van Hollen in El Salvador "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The report says he was wearing a "sweatshirt with rolls of money covering up the faces of the presidents".  Later it says he had about $1,100 in "funds" on him,  Are they talking about the rolls of money? Why doesn't it say that?  He was wearing a cap and a hoodie, and we found rolls of money on him, proving gang affiliation?

I don't really see anything in this report that is criminal? Am I missing something?

I also don't think $1100 in cash means you are a gang member? Illegal immigrants usually can't have bank accounts, right? They get paid in cash...[/quote]

So much for the never committed a crime mantra. [/quote]

I mean, we know that people here illegally committed the crime of being here, illegally. No one is arguing that.

But we don't send them to concentration camps, with no due process.  The process was not followed with this man.

You have to follow the law and do things the right way. And sending people to out of country concentration camps isn't the right way.

I am 100% certain we are paying the president of El Salvadore money for this, too. It should be easy enough to find that information, right? There must be some kind of record of government spending.

If we are paying money to El Salvador for these prisoners?  That needs to stop immediately. That's not right at all.
[/quote]

There's also all the financial crimes associated with the cash economy. Would love to see his 1040s...[/quote]

Is it the position of these posters saying leave him there that SCOTUS didn’t consider the evidence and arguments from both sides, or just that SCOTUS, and thereby checks/balances, can be ignored?[/quote]
A little bit of both.  Now the government is saying they are not paying for him to be held in El Salvador, which is not the assumption the Supreme Court had.
Also, the Supreme Court has not been ignored because they told the judge to clarify the order and to facilitate release from custody.  Supreme Court did not say return to US, and strongly suggested that is not something that can be ordered by the judiciary.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics