Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Stabbing at The Brandywine in 4500 block Connecticut Ave. NW DC"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Last I checked, there weren’t any residency requirements. That’s why there are more people in the voucher program now than the entire homeless population a decade ago. And the housing voucher program is just one of the many programs D.C. has for the homeless (for example, the people living in the Cathedral Heights shelter are in a different program). All of the money D.C. has put into this over the past decade has only increased the homeless population. Is this surprising? If you tell homeless people, addicts, and criminals that if they come to D.C., they’ll get expensive apartments, no strings attached, seemingly for life, why wouldn’t they come? What’s insane is that D.C. voters keep voting for this. Goulet’s opposition was pretty mild, saying that if we just dump these people into apartments with no plan to rehabilitate them, they’re not going to get better. He was painted as a racist by the other candidates in the race, the City Paper, and the professional activist crowd, and Ward 3 voters rejected him. The prevailing political climate in the city seems to be “take everything you can from people who are gainfully employed, give it all to criminals and drug addicts.” The voucher program even specifies that’s who the program is for.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics