Reply to Stanford dean of DEI attacks invited speaker, Judge Kyle Duncan

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Stanford dean of DEI attacks invited speaker, Judge Kyle Duncan"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am against clerkship boycotts.  But to be honest, clerks from top 25 schools are pretty much fungible.[/quote]

I think it is very much warranted in this case.

"Rules aren't rules without consequences," Ho said. "And students who practice intolerance don't belong in the legal profession."
Calling the disruption an act of "intellectual terrorism," Ho argued that Duncan's treatment reflects "rampant" viewpoint discrimination at elite law schools, some of which do not employ a single center-right professor.
It is no coincidence, Ho said, that the worst free speech incidents have occurred at the law schools with the least intellectual diversity. Though Ho did not say what it would take for him to lift the boycott, he implied that a more politically diverse faculty—and a less ideologically uniform administration—would go a long way.[/quote]

How is what Ho is doing different from cancel culture?[/quote]

What is it the left always likes to say?  “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.”[/quote]

Interesting. This question has only been met with whattaboutism. I guess you all are fine letting "the left" write the rules of engagement.

Cheers, carry on.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics