Reply to Prince Harry’s book

Forum Index » The DCUM Book Club

Reply to "Prince Harry’s book"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I read the book. Harry’s ideas were not workable for the royal family. That doesn’t mean they were unwilling to use his ideas. It means they considered his ideas and rejected them because it is not how the royal family works. They encouraged Haz to forge his own path and pay his own way, and he is having his revenge. It’s beyond sad and spiteful. [/quote]

Had you read the book, you'd know that it was workable [i]and had been done by others[/i].  Had you reach the book, you'd know that Harry was willing to do anything that would allow him to keep his security detail - except maintaining the status quo where they were both full time working royals.  The choice the BFR gave him was either keep things the way they are or you are cut off. [/quote]

I’m sorry, but you’re lying. NP to this thread. I’ve read it. Harry is dishonest. The specific branding and monetization he and Meghan sought had never been done by others nor approved by others. It’s simply not true.

The way he treated Pat in print to me is the clearest indicator of what a rotten soul he has. I felt such pity for the public face he put on after losing his mom. He has utterly no empathy for others, and it’s revolting. YMMV.[/quote]

DP- You’re right! Harry never marketed or branded gin —  like the Queen, or horses — like the Queen, Anne, and Zara; or baked goods like Charles; or cooperated with a biography— like Charles; or wrote books — like Fergie, Princess Michael, and the Duke of Kent; of accepted commercial endorsements like Fergie, Peter, and Zara; or appeared on a reality show like Mike Tindall.  So, no, “ the specific branding and monetization that he and Meghan sought” may not have been done or approved (hard to know — without more specifics) but given what has been done, whatever the boundaries of doing so are have included quite a range, from Peter’s milk commercial to the Queen’s own gin.

Your criticisms of a schoolboy as “rotten” and with “utterly no empathy” mirror the tabloids take, so: eh. If that’s your take as well, tennagers in general and most human beings beyond infancy must revolt you quite a lot.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics