Reply to Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Her name has been bandied about as the possible leaker but let’s not forget that we know Ginni Thomas was enmeshed in the GOP’s attempt to overthrow the government.

[twitter]https://mobile.twitter.com/MollyJongFast/status/1522777512824213507?cxt=HHwWhsC4vY6F_6EqAAAA[/twitter][/quote]

She’s hideous.  If the spouse of a liberal justice had behaved as she did, the GOP would be screaming that she needs to be impeached [/quote]
No, the Democrats have been saying that Clarence Thomas needs to be investigated. Ginni Thomas, while a ball of dung, holds no public position and thus cannot be impeached. [/quote]

He enjoyed $600k of her income from The Family Foundation and failed to report it on his financial disclosure statements for several years.  He was allowed to revise the statements after three years.  Ginni earns more as a RW activist than Clarence does at his day job. He’s pulling in a lot from his speaking engagements lately.  He should resign. He’s corrupt.[/quote]

Did not know justices were allowed to do this. Is there any cap on how much they can make?[/quote]

Have you slept through the last three months while this was discussed?  I doubt there is a ceiling but I know certain groups will give a ridiculously high fee , like $50k for a speech. Republicans spilled their pearls when FORMER President Bill Clinton received $25k for a speech.  Now I think it’s the minimum.  The point is all federal employees have to file an annual financial report and Clarence lied on his for three years in a row.   He’s a liar and he’s corrupt.[/quote]

Omg. Remember when Rs would flip TF out over “speaker fees”?

We’ve come quite a long way since then. 
[/quote]

Clarence Thomas currently fills a position on the Supreme Court and he accepts speaker fees from large political groups who potentially have cases before him.   Can he be any more corrupt?  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics