Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So true [twitter]https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1506972421240377356?t=qHteOmk-TNu4ihM_vfenkA&s=19[/twitter][/quote] It will be blatant proof of systemic racism by whites if she isn’t put on the court. Anyway, what is pacer?[/quote] Public Access to Court Electronic Records, the system that Federal Courts use for people to access documents. It means Grassley's team was looking over the records of cases she's heard as a judge (not sure why they wouldn't have finished that before the third day of hearing)[/quote] Isn’t her legal record as a judge supposed to be the main focus of the hearings? [/quote] Of course, my point wasn't "they shouldn't review her record" it's that she's been touted as a possibly nominee from the beginning and been the formal nominee for a month, why would you be on PACER on the last day of her testimony? I have no idea if they were looking up her record then or not, but if they were, that seems like sloppiness.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics