Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Barr and Durham"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Carter Page’s book is out. Turns out he met with FBI five times in March 2017. Kind of hard to claim it was just an oopsie after all. [/quote] Only liberals who refuse to admit this was a blatant attempt at preventing/overturning a presidency think it is only an oopsie. [/quote] 2017=after Trump was inaugurated. There was no preventing or overturning. [/quote] But there was spying![/quote] Would anything gathered in the investigation have been used for purposes of impeaching Trump? Certainly seems like it, so wouldn't that have been an attempt to overturn a presidential election by removing Trump from office?[/quote] I still don't understand why Trump supporters thin the hundreds of contacts between the Trump orbit and the Russian government, Russian oligarchs and the GRU are normal or ok. Please explain.[/quote] That wasn't the issue. Rather, the issue was whether the surveillance and investigation were being conducted to gather evidence intended for use in removing a sitting president, effectively nullifying the 2016 election.[/quote] They were surveilling members of the Russian Government and Russian spies for the purpose of protecting our country. It isn't the FBI's fault that people like Kushner, Flynn and Junior were rolled up because they were talking to them so much. Why are you ok with all of the points of contact between Trump orbit and Russians?[/quote] I question the rationale you're using here. It's clear from various text messages and emails of the key players that there was a cabal of folks who were conducting the investigation with an eye towards removing Trump from office. I believe Strock (sp?) used the phrase "insurance policy," while Clinesmith used the phrase "viva la resistance", just to name a couple. If everything was above board and by the book, why did Sally Yates testify that Comey had "gone rogue"?[/quote] Is this some sort of elaborate sarcasm? Or do you you just totally misunderstand what anyone means or meant by "Vive la resistance"?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics