Reply to #JustinsTrafficJam

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "#JustinsTrafficJam"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes, I know. That is why I suggested that the Episcopalians kick in some land for affordable housing.  The head of the seminary and his wife are British citizens and should understand the need for council housing in Alexandria.  [/quote]

I am sure they are considering long term planning for utilization of Seminary land, including all aspects of the Seminary's mission, as responsible administrators would.

[/quote]

The plan is to combine many of their seminaries starting with the Seminary in Connecticut.   That is why they are building new faculty houses and renovating buildings.  They are nit giving an inch of land to anyone [/quote]

I've lived near Episcopal High schools for decades. Episcopal pays the City no taxes. If it's true they won't provide some land for affordable housing in exchange, shame on them and their committee. "We are all in this together" (Romney King quote).[/quote]

No private school, church, or other non profit is required to do that.  The churches that have developed AH are working with developers  (like AHDC) to do so and are getting paid for their land.

The Seminary's obligation under state law is to continue its non profit mission of educating students.  Though the also open their campus to the public which may use the open space.

And this harping on affordable housing is a red herring.  The leading opponents of the changes on Seminary - the Seminary Hill and Clover College Park civic associations - are NOT proponents of affordable housing, or indeed, of any further development in that area.

If they are going to advocated for either relaxation of zoning to allow accessory dwelling units, or for committed affordable housing on the Seminary property (or anywhere else in the areas they cover) I look forward very much to seeing that.

Meanwhile this is just a talking point to be used against the institution that was here before they were, and for which the road itself is named. [/quote]

Wow.  What makes you think these civic associations are against affordable housing? I am a CCPCA board member. We are not against affordable housing.  The president of SHA sits on the city's ARHA board.  Why don't you quit making shit up.  Also, please stop assuming some random person online is associated with those organizations.   [/quote]

Plus 1.  We are blocks from Quaker Hill affordable units in Clover and College Park.   Seminary Hill is bordered my scattered site ARHA townhouses.   It is the poster PP refers to who is making assumptions about us. [/quote]

I don't think ARHA has $ for more units in this area now.  You are talkinga about old developments that no one can do anything about.    More likely would be some large workforce or mixed project.  Other housing initiatives likely to legalize duplexes.   If SHA supported the new project at King and Menokin I am not aware of it (its far from CCP so I would not expect them to have a position).

Certainly if either association wants to go on record requesting either more committed AH in the area, or legalizing duplexes, that would be very powerful.  Please link to where they have done that.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics