Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Senior Trump Official Pens Op-Ed in the NYT calling President Amoral"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Let’s recap with what we know: -nyt op ed received some sort of communication from an individual. Because of the sensitivity, there’s no way they didn’t diligently confirm and/or meet in person with the author. And there is no way they made it up, etc. They know the press is under attack; they are playing things safe. -we know it was either —pence or pence staffer —OR someone who wanted it to look like pence. Someone who specifically knows he uses that term —third possibility: it’s a coincidence that the word was used —fourth: it was a 2+ individuals including ^^ It appears to be true, and or match up with other accounts. If YOU think it’s not true, that trumps administration is run like a well-oiled, communicative machine—then go ahead and state you evidence. I think the telephone recording is my evidence that comms are not good. Basically, a bunch of staff knew about this and did not bring it to his attention. What kind of workplace is that? (I have worked in good and bad workplaces, and the call is reminiscent of a bad work environment.)[/quote] ^sorry, to clarify, when I said telephone recording, that was on the subject of the Woodward book—that communication is the evidence of a defunct workplace: staff was not able to/wanted to/afraid to communicate, or not listened to[/quote] NYTimes Opinion editor says he was initially contacted by a go-between but he did eventually meet the anonymous writer (and has met this person multiple times). We do not know it was Pence or a Pence staffer. That is pure speculation and somewhat contradicted by things the NYTimes opinion editor has said. [/quote] I didn’t say it was a pence staffer (or pence). But likely it’s an either or. If it wasn’t him/staffer, there’s a 99.9% chance they attempted to pin it on him [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics