Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Good for Blake. She forced them to say that her point of view had merit and deserved to be heard. Yes it did. [/quote]

She quite literally was shown to be a liar and had her career ruined. And it was only getting worse at trial here there would be abundant evidence that people find her unlikable whenever she opens her mouth in an unscripted setting.[/quote]

And yet Wayfarer made a huge concession in the public statement. Why is that, do you think? [/quote]

People aren’t being reasonable. While Wayfarer had a good chance of being fully vindicated at trial, a trial is always a risk. In this case, wayfarer is the one being sued and the only one at risk of losing even more money. The statement, which was from the lawyers by the way, [b]strongly suggests that the deal was no money[/b] but a face saving statement for Blake. I know we all wanted to see wayfarer vindicated but we weren’t the ones at risk of losing millions more, no matter how small the risk might have seemed.[/quote]

In what way? It simply doesn't mention money at all, which is not uncommon for settlement statements. It was almost certainly a requirement for negotiation (that there be absolutely no hint at how much money changed hands).[/quote]

It wreaks of no money b/c of the timing and the fact that they even gave lively the face saving olive branch at all. Things were going really bad for her. Down to three claims with another MJOP pending that threatened to knock it down to one. Wayfarer stipulated to the protected activity which effed up Lively’s trial strategy. Her lawyers were upset about it but the judge rejected their request for a letter response. More documents were set to be unsealed. And you have to remember lively is the one who requested the protective order so it stands to reason that a lot of what was set to come out was embarrassing to her (more Taylor swift texts anyone?!). And it’s super clear things were being sealed not because they were sensitive but because they were embarrassing to Blake. There was nothing sensitive about the text released this week showing she asked to have dailies destroyed. It was just embarrassing. We haven’t even seen Lively’s full deposition. The clock was ticking for all of that to come out. She had a lot more to lose than gain given how decimated her case was.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics