Reply to Kamala Harris for President

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Kamala Harris for President"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Interesting to take a short walk down memory lane.....
There have been many more like these in the past year.  Amazing how the lemmings have fallen into line......

Sept., 2023
[b]Columnists call for Biden to drop Harris, pick new running mate[/b]

[quote]Several columnists have an idea on how to make President Joe Biden more electable in 2024: Drop Vice President Kamala Harris and pick a new running mate.

Yes, voters think Biden may be too old to serve another four years, according to recent polls, but three columnists believe that a stronger running mate will gain traction in the country or even in the party.

In a piece urging Biden not to run again, Washington Post columnist David Ignatius suggested as a backup plan that Biden could replace Harris with Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass or Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.

Ignatius says voters are sensibly focusing on Harris because of Biden’s age, while noting that Harris is less popular than Biden, with a 39.5 percent approval rating, according to the polling website FiveThirtyEight.

“Biden could encourage a more open vice-presidential selection process that could produce a stronger running mate,” Ignatius writes.

Biden himself has committed to Harris as his running mate for 2024. He said last year, “She’s going to be my running mate, No. 1. And No. 2, I did put her in charge. I think she’s doing a good job.”

In a New York Magazine Intelligencer column, Eric Levitz floats several options to replace Harris including Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) and Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.).

“To be sure, replacing Harris with another running mate is not a great option,” Levitz writes. “It’s just that Democrats have no good ones. It is risky to switch out the first Black and female vice-president for someone else. But it is also risky to saddle an 81-year-old nominee with an exceptionally unpopular running mate who — if all goes well — will be all but guaranteed the party’s nomination in 2028.”[/quote]
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/13/columnists-biden-harris-new-running-mate-00115559

Jan., 2024
[b]Biden Owes the Country a New Vice President[/b]

[quote]This brings me to the matter of Biden’s vice-presidential choice. Kamala Harris, the current holder of the post, shares with Henry Wallace progressive values and a proclivity to verbal infelicities. There are no indications that she would be soft on Russia or otherwise swerve—as Donald Trump has—from mainstream American foreign-policy tenets. But neither are there indications that she has developed, over her three years in the White House, any strong, recognizable convictions on America’s role in the world, or how Washington should exercise global leadership. Equally importantly, she has struggled mightily to move the public on any aspect of policy, even those policies—such as civil rights and immigration—on which she has taken an active interest or prominent role. While Republicans, most notably Donald Trump, have leveled, and will continue to level, ad hominem attacks and unsubstantiated charges against Harris, they will be amply justified in making her presence on the ticket a major campaign issue.
https://time.com/6589518/joe-biden-owes-the-country-new-vice-president/
[/quote]

Feb., 2024
[b]Roosevelt fixed his serious VP mistake. Will Biden?[/b]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/02/23/franklin-roosevelt-changed-running-mates/

[/quote]

And you want her to grant interviews to these aholes? [/quote]

If she is too much of a coward to sit down with what we know is a compliant press, then we know she will be a coward when dealing with Xi Jinping or Putin.  [/quote]
We already know Trump is a coward with Xi and Putin.[/quote]

[b]I'll just point out that Putin made no moves when Trump was in office. [/b] Can't say the same about Obama or Biden/Harris. 
And, Xi wasn't saber rattling when it comes to Taiwan.

Having seen how this administration has responded to national and international crises, I'll take Trump any day.  [/quote]

Because they were allies.[/quote]

And there was ongoing fighting in Donbas.

Xi didn't have to rattle anything, because Trump was in his corner. After all, his daughter received a bunch of Chinese trademarks.

"“He’s a friend of mine. He’s actually a – I think he’s doing an amazing job as a leader, and I wouldn’t want to do anything that comes in the way of that. So, I would certainly want to speak to him first,” Trump said."[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics