Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This thing about the dailies is such a nothing, the person that predicted this was spun up because something bad was coming for Justin was spot on.[/quote]

For the hundredth time, Justin was no longer a defendant in this case. He didn’t even have to show up for trial.

Blake stans are so delusional and for what? You’ll never see her in a movie again and her hair company is winding down. Moving to London and confirming there will be no Deadpool four is the best decision the couple could’ve made.

I just hope the divorce chatter goes away. As much as I don’t like Blake and Ryan, I do not want to see their marriage destroyed over this. [/quote]

Exactly.  Justin wasn't a defendant.  Wayfarer could care less about a statement appeasing Blake.  It doesn't hurt them in any way.  Why is this so hard for people to grasp?[/quote]

This is disingenuous. Justin founded Wayfarer. If Wayfarer was found liable, it would be due to Justin's behavior. The idea that he was somehow no longer involved is not believable. And his lawyers had already said he planned to testify at the trial (because everyone understood that it was his company/rep/behavior on trial, even if Wayfarer was the technical defendant).

Also people not paying close attention could care less about Wayfarer. They want to know who won, Justin or Blake? And that's how any trial updates or outcomes would have been reported, especially in the tabloids.[/quote]

But the average person is reading "Wayfarer" and not "Justin Baldoni."  Not everyone has the legal minds of DCUM.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics