Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]"Movies are collaborative art and there was a power struggle on the set of this movie." LOL, nothing collaborative about having your husband make his own cut of the movie, and asking the studio to destroy the delays.[/quote] Are you saying movies are not a collaborative art form? Go make a few movies with no other people involved, see how that works. Power struggles and personality conflicts are common on film sets specifically because it is not possible to make a movie without the work and input of a bunch of different people. You would be shocked by the stuff people say about their colleagues on films on a daily basis on movies you liked and about which you never heard a negative word. A lot of the drama inherent in Hollywood exists because you need a bunch of different people to make movies, many of those people are the very best at their job and have egos to match their skill. Conflicts over which cut is released are common. Conflicts over what happens to footage that doesn't make the Final Cut are becoming more common because of the fight over AI and actors wanting the ability to control what happens to video footage of them after a movie is done (especially sensitive for actresses whose footage could be used to create AI that looks just like them engaging in lewd sex acts, a particular issue on a movie with romantic scenes and violence like IEWU). But go off.[/quote] Keep up, I know it's hard. Blake was hired as an actress and Ryan had zero responsibility for the film. Yet he literally has been caught making his own cut of the film and trying to pass it off as Blake's. Add in that he asked the studio to destroy the dailies. No wonder they fought unsealing the documents -- they are going to lose this trial, and only work again if self financed. Well deserved for their antics.[/quote] Could you point to the document where Ryan requests the destruction of the dailies? Thanks.[/quote] oh sorry, he had his mouthpiece Blake do that. Same difference. Document 1429-62.[/quote] That document doesn't quote Ryan or Blake. It's Ange Giannetti saying "Blake asked us to destroy some of the dailies. want to tell you what we will and won't do. also going to ask bridget to contact all vendors and ask them to delete all dailies and need them to proof. ok?" This doesn't reference a request form Blake. It references the fact that her nudity rider required the film to delete any dailies featuring her in any state of nudity (this would include the partial nudity in the birth scene). It is written into a contract to protect an actor who may be concerned about what will become of all the footage of them nude or partially nude on camera. It is not unheard of, and it makes sense that Blake wanted to enforce the provision given the bad blood between her and Wayfarer at that point -- not much trust left by that point. This is not a big deal at all.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics