Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Are there cases where people would be in one region under one boundary option but other region for another? If so how that would seem to complicate how to advocate for your child’s needs. This is a mess.[/quote] I'm not following. Isn't the idea that each of the regions will have the same offerings? In which case it doesn't matter which region you end up in?[/quote] [b]There appear to be different options for magnets [/b]or whatever we are calling them. Also I’m not entirely clear if we are still in the world where a school would “offer” a class but wouldn’t necessarily teach the class (if subscription was low, for example). That would seem to imply something like the consortia model where you try to get into another school to take the relevant class.[/quote] If we have standardized programs in each region then it will be an uniform offering for each region.[/quote] As a teacher, education is all about differentiation to meet the diverse needs of students. A one-size-fits-all approach for MCPS' secondary education suggests a lazy, perhaps incompetent, approach by the school district. I think they are in over their heads on this endeavor.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics