Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Sports General Discussion
Reply to "Arlington proposing to close county gymnastics program"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]PP what you are demanding is the county work harder to subsidize your competitive gymnastics team. I mean cmon. I don’t want them spending their time doing that as a taxpayer. [/quote] DPR's time is compensated by the fees they earn from rec classes. If they aren't doing their job and they keep cutting offerings year over year, then revenue keeps dropping year over year, resulting in cuts year over year. This year it's gymnastics. Next year it could be swim or senior programs or teen programs. It's a downward spiral. There's no reason the gymnastics program can't be self-supporting and offer gymnastics to a wide range of kids and adults in Arlington.[/quote] Watch the presentation. They look at programs in terms of community benefit vs individual benefit etc. No one said DPR is fully recovering it's costs to run their dept through fees. [/quote] I watched the presentation and you can hear the county manager explain the year-over-year cuts stating that they have to go deeper every year. And the more you cut the less revenue you have so the more you have to cut the next year.[/quote] This is not what he said. At all. The County overall has had to take cuts for many years at this point due to expense increases outpacing revenue increases. DPR has already taken many cuts to services in past years. So the “easier” ones have already been taken. That is what he said. The part you’re saying about the more you cut the less revenue you have so you have to cut more the next year is made up. And doesn’t even make sense. They are not cutting programs that are bringing in more money than they cost. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics