Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Report of shooting at or near wootton "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Return SROs - principals NEVER wanted them to be removed. County Executives did it anyways. [/quote] They have one. He just happened to not be on site. https://wtop.com/montgomery-county/2026/02/1-shot-inside-wootton-high-school-in-rockville/[/quote] That's because it's not an SRO but a CEO. A CEO does not stay inside the school nor walk the halls unless invited by the Principal. A CEO is shared with the cluster. Bring back SROs.[/quote] No, we don't need police in schools and they don't really stop shit like this from happening, anyway. See Uvalde or Parkland, for example. [/quote] Yes, we do. A good officer could shoot the shooter. There are plenty of situations where they do step in and resolve it. The two you are choosing are the worst but there are many times SRO's save lives. Some schools have an officer sitting outside a lot of time. Ours do.[/quote] All schools needs metal detectors. The school is huge. An officer cant cover the whole school. They would not have prevented a one off shooting targeting a specific individual. A police officer may be able to reduce the amount of people killed in a mass shooting but most times, they won’t be able to stop a shooting from happening in the first place.[/quote] Sign the petition https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1259637.page[/quote] The WUSA story said that the student had a ghost gun. Not an expert here, but wouldn't a metal detector be useless in that instance? (obviously it would prevent other firearms from getting through....just saying that I don't know if it would have made a difference here). I personally think that re-instating the SRO program and focusing on prevention is the most critical need here. [/quote] Ammo casings likely would set off the alarm but yeah[/quote] The outside of the gun is all polymer but the inside is still metal. Otherwise it would fall apart [/quote] Please, if you don’t know what you’re talking about, don’t embarrass yourself. “The outside of the gun is all polymer.@. This is not true. Typically the frame is polymer and other parts including the slide assembly are metal. “The inside is still metal.” Not necessarily. “Otherwise it would fall apart.” It isn’t the material that holds the firearm together. “Ammo casings.” Pointless. As noted upthread there is plenty of metal even in an unloaded polymer framed firearm to set off a metal detector. The “ghost” moniker refers to putative traceability, not detectability. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics