Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So now the deluded Blake poster is accusing Vanity Fair of putting incorrect information out there and not fact checking? They are a pretty reputable magazine. This would be a pretty big mistake. I would think if Scarlett’s people were preparing legal action against Baldoni they would have a real problem with Vanity Fair, putting in the article that she had never met him. They would probably want that taken out. I can’t even believe we’re having this conversation. Can someone point me to speculation that it’s Scarlet beyond DCUM and this one delusional poster? No one is coming to save Blake. Not Taylor, not Scarlet. She’s dug her own hole.[/quote] I think it's weird you think Blake needs saving when Baldoni is losing this case.[/quote] You’re the one trying to hype this declaration ( and probably the same poster who posted endlessly about the JV declaration which turned out to be a nothing burger). In any case, Blake is losing horribly on the pr front, no one in the general public gives two shits about the MTD. Meaningful for the parties but no one else.[/quote] I'm not trying to "hype" the declaration. I think it's interesting. It's a person swearing under oath that they were verbally harassed by Baldoni, on the set of another Wayfarer production, to the point that they asked him to not be involved in the production anymore. And this same person is apparently the one to whom Sarowitz said that alleged comment about destroying Blake and Ryan like Israel destroys Hamas. One reason I'm interested to find out who this is is that these are huge allegations and I want to decide if I believe them. Maybe they are BS. Maybe they are legit. Hard to know when the declaration is redacted and it's currently anonymous. Thus, yeah, I'm speculating on who it might be because this is a message board where people discuss and speculate about this case. I think it's weird you are NOT curious about the identity of this person and the allegations they are making here.[/quote] As with everything Blake, I think this will be underwhelming when revealed. It’s like she forgets that everything she files will be fact checked. Let’s put you down for ScarJo and then reevaluate your powers of prognostication that you are always crowing about. For what it’s worth, NAG thinks the declarant is Blake herself.[/quote] The idea that it's Blake makes no sense because in addition to this person being on set with Baldoni, they also say they had a 1:1 meeting with Sarowitz where he made the Hamas comment, and in other legal filings it is said that this comment was made to a "third party." So it cannot be Blake. I know people think she'll lie about anything, but her lawyers would not put such an obvious inconsistency/lie within the pleadings themselves, for their own protection. Blake cannot be a "third party" in this case. I've also seen the argument it could be Ryan, but the filing say that this person was "working with Wayfarer on an unrelated project," and I don't think there is any way to twist that to be Ryan (or, for that matter, Blake). I also don't think Ryan would agree to a 1:1 meeting with Sarowitz. So while I get the desire for this to be Blake or Ryan, it seems clear that it can't be either of them. It's a genuine 3rd party who worked with Wayfarer/Baldoni on another project. And by the way the declaration is phrased, I don't think it can be Liz Plank because her work with Wayfarer was on an ongoing podcast, which is inconsistent with the phrase "the majority of the production." This indicates it was a discrete project (like a film) with a set, and a starting and ending point of production.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics