Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Tweens and Teens
Reply to "Does anyone hate how competitive the world has become?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is not true at all. There are tons of sports that require wealth. Sure it helps if kids have an athletic physique once they go through puberty; however, wealth makes quite a difference in a lot of sports. Downhill skiing, squash, tennis, golf, hockey, equestrian sports, fencing, ice skating are some examples of sports that require tons of money. My friend taught at a private school in Florida where it accommodated students' sports schedules which included swimming, tennis, equestrian sports, fencing and car racing. All of those kids were super wealthy.[/quote] [b]Yes they may require money but it doesn’t necessarily mean the kids will be good[/b]. Are you seriously debating this [/quote] Are you kidding? You need money to get good in tennis or golf. Even Francis Tiafoe needs serious training that JTCC provided him for FREE due to his family situation. Scott Scheffler wouldn't be the best golfer in the world had his family was poor. If you have kid A and B with the same athletic ability, but kid A has wealth and kid B is poor, kid A will come out ahead in athletic because kid A gets the best training money can buy.[/quote] You’re forgetting about the genetics that are needed to create an elite athlete. You can bring the kid to reach his full potential by hard work, good nutrition and training but without certain genetics his full potential won’t be good enough. Look at the Olympic sprinters. Do you think money would allow your child to be that fast? The ACTN3 gene, is sometimes referred to as the “athlete gene”. In our muscles, the two main types of muscle fibres are slow-twitch and fast-twitch fibres. These are the easily identified genes that can found on a DNA saliva test. My family is middle class with a lot of athletes including pro athletes. Nobody needed crazy excessive training, no private coaches. [/quote] Both your lies about your family and your lack of understanding about how much training even the kid with great genetics undergo are comical. Caleb Williams had a QB coach starting in 8th grade, Quincy Wilson has had professional coaching since 6th grade…the list goes on and on…[/quote] I don’t know, I think you have a pretty compelling list there of (let me count again) TWO examples of athletes who has professional coaching as kids. I think two gets you fully out of the realm of “anecdote” doesn’t it?[/quote] It’s everyone…considering you didnt even list your fake family pro athletes that’s infinitely more than your zero. Name me one recent pro athlete that fits your description.[/quote] DP but are you asking for someone to name a professional athlete who got there not due to expensive private coaching but rather due to having superior genetics even though they were only middle class growing up? You can’t be serious.[/quote] How can you possibly separate the two..even the ones with superior genetics all have private coaching. Everyone…they may get it for free or low cost…but they all get it. So, yes name one that had no private coaching and turned pro.[/quote] I mean… I would think technically anyone who is on a high school team gets some form of private coaching (professional high school coaches are only going to coach the kids they personally select for their team, right?). Maybe you need to define your terms here. And if they’re getting extra private coaching for free, that’s because they have superior athletic ability and has nothing whatsoever to do with their family’s wealth or resources, so you are basically proving a PP’s point that if you’re athletic you don’t need money to make it… I certainly don’t think some random Joe who has literally never been coached before is going to walk onto an NFL team. I am uncertain as to the point you think you are making.[/quote] You don’t think there are kids blessed with great genetics that go nowhere in sports because they didn’t have money or connections to people that could help them? That’s most of them. One of the best AAU travel teams in the DMV is Team Durant. Every kid on the team has multiple D1 offers. Every kid is actually UMC including the JR kid…and yes the Sidwell, O’Connell and other players. Go look at the best NHL stars…outside of the Canadians they all come from elite boarding and private schools. The best HS baseball players are primarily UMC including Ethan Holliday and basically every player on the U18 team that just won the international baseball championship in Panama. SJC has a kid that may go high in the 2026 draft and he is from Great Falls…who BTW has been getting training since a middle schooler. Bryce Eldridge trained at R&D privately for years even though he also had great coaches at Madison. Once more…just name one player that fits your profile…you can’t even do that. That’s not how things work anymore. [/quote] You’re out of your mind. Seriously. Also, LOL to the “outside of the Canadians” comment re: the NHL (and you mean “outside of the Canadians… and the Europeans” anyway, so you know, most of the players in the NHL) but sure, I think ice hockey *in the US* is more of a rich kid sport. Happy?[/quote] So…you come back with nothing…other than I am out of my mind because I gave several specific examples across multiple sports. That’s literally all you have. I thought so. You can’t give one example. BTW, the European hockey players are all plucked for National Academies at a young age. Same for basketball and soccer…for soccer, you have kids as young as 5 getting tagged for talent. Ignorance is bliss.[/quote] What you are failing to understand is the talented kids *aren’t paying* for their “elite” training. Parents like you, with no athletic ability and no size and no skill but with plenty of money, are paying to “train” your kids at these facilities… because they need your money to train the kids who actually have potential. IMG academy costs 90K a year. You know who’s not paying that? Most of the kids who are going to turn pro. But the academy (which ultimately is only interested in training those kids) needs funding, and that’s where rich parents like you come in. Then they can lure in the next generation of suckers by touting how many of their alumni turned pro! But that’s not going to be your kid, Dude. If you’re the one seeking out the opportunities, and you’re the one paying for the training, your kid probably doesn’t have it. Sorry.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics