Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Schools near metro will get more housing without overcrowding relief"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If this is going to continue to be more about housing and less about schools can this thread be moved to another forum.[/quote] The discuasion [i]has[/i] been about schools. This is just a closely related initiative to the state bill, and the combination of the two is really impactful. More housing in areas that don't have space for new schools and where schools are already at/above capacity is a school issue. Expecting schools to appear with increased density is magical thinking without a clear plan, and such a plan is unlikely due to the great expense and decades-long heel-dragging of the county that has allowed the overcrowding in the first place.[/quote] The housing will not spontaneously generate new students. It is true that it might redistribute existing students to over-capacity schools, although I think they would probably also be coming from over-capacity schools.[/quote] As has been discussed in this thread, that's more magical thinking that all (or even a majority) of the new housing will simply go to house those currently in the area.[/quote] It's certainly something that could be studied. But in the absence of data, it's just as much "magical thinking" to say that the housing will spontaneously generate new students as to say that it won't.[/quote] Ha! Any demographer worth their salt would disagree with you.[/quote] I'm happy to look at any data or studies you (or they) have.[/quote] Duck Duck Go first result from search for "do additional housing units yield additional students" https://education.illinoisstate.edu/downloads/planning/Grip_49_3-4_PC_2020.pdf I'm sure there are others.[/quote] This study says that residents moving into new housing units tend to have school-aged children and that residents who have lived in the same housing unit for a long time tend not to have school-aged children. Which makes sense! But it does not address the question.[/quote] The study shows expected student yields from different types of new housing. Hint while you are looking (the charts are an easy find) -- the average/expectation is non-zero. You housing bros are just too much.[/quote] The study doesn't say whether those students are NEW TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. Not to mention that a study from New Jersey, which has 593 school districts, would have different results for that question than a study from Maryland, which has 24.[/quote] You don't understand what yield means, do you? The study suggests that 100 new homes would add between 43 and 99 new students, depending on housing type (condo/TH or detached SFH) and representative data set analyzed (community/county or state). Maybe you are relying on that magical "there won't be many new residents to the area in that new housing because it will be filled by families that are living two or more to a unit in the area today" thinking? There certainly may be [i]some[/i] difference between adding housing in a relatively wealthy New Jersey suburban community and a relatively wealthy suburban Maryland county. To suggest that one would yield new students and the other wouldn't is ludicrous, however. You asked for a study to cast doubt on the relatively obvious observation that new housing units would result in additional students. I was able to find that lickety-split. From your responses, you'll just be taking this into the rabbit hole of constantly asking others to defend a position while you never defend yours. Typical.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics