Reply to TJ admissions decision - repercussions for Class of 2026

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "TJ admissions decision - repercussions for Class of 2026"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Who did FCPS retain for the appeal?[/quote]

One of the highest profile appellate firms in the country

https://www.mto.com/lawyers/donald-b-verrilli-jr[/quote]

But I thought he was taking it on pro bono (in exchange, no doubt, for being looked on favorably for a future job in a Democratic administration by defending avowed anti-Asian racists as long as they are Democrats).  [/quote]

He’s a former Solicitor General. Save for pulling an Elena Kagan, that’s pretty much a terminal position. Your assertion makes no sense. [/quote]

So no pro bono then?[/quote]

He is absolutely working pro bono. This is a challenge for conservatives (and, evidently, TJ-aspirant parents) to understand, but sometimes people do things just because they're the right thing to do.[/quote]

It's not necessarily the right thing to do, but it's obviously something that earns you additional points within the Democratic establishment, which has shown time and time again they will throw Asians and middle-class whites under the bus if it helps the wealthy stave off calls for greater reforms from URMs.

Anyone who actually is progressive would have demanded that FCPS shut down TJHSST years ago.  The liberals cut deals, and filthy ones at that.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics