Reply to Thread for Derek Chauvin trial watchers?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Thread for Derek Chauvin trial watchers?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]From NYT:

[quote]Mr. Nelson also sought to portray the medical care that Mr. Floyd received from paramedics as lacking, saying they had not inserted a tube down Mr. Floyd’s throat until nine minutes after they arrived.[/quote]

WTF. Didn't we learn from the paramedic herself that the cops had told her to back off?![/quote]

You may be confusing an off duty MFD employee with the dispatched EMTs who treated Floyd. The dispatch EMTs were both male.

In my opinion he was mostly trying to elicit testimony on the complications at the scene that led the EMTs to choose to move to another location (which required one to drive the ambulance while Lane assisted the other in the back of the ambulance). This is probably really the main point that could bolster the assertion of a complex scene/crowd. Defense has floated the concept of crowd complications in the use of force sections of the trial. It’s not a particularly strong argument as far as I see it, but the defense has to present some narrative.

Any critical care complications could create reasonable doubt, but as we move into medical testimony it’ll probably become more clear that Floyd’s pulse couldn’t be detected before an ambulance arrived. There’s no objectively reasonable wrongdoing by the EMTs (as far as we’ve seen), so it would be hard for Nelson to go too far down that path without losing credibility. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics