Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Cliff Notes summary of MCPS boundary study fight?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] This has to be a joke. [b]Do you really not see how you have proven my point?[/b] 1. Then Churchill stays low diversity and Whitman doesn't. 2. The reverse 3. Both attain higher diversity through boundary changes that require busing. (It is also possible that the County would make more minor changes to either or both schools boundaries. But then, you still have low diversity. This could apply to 1 and 2 as well, but in any case you are back to one of the two possibilities I raised.) 4. Both schools remain low diversity. 5. It is hard to see how the concept of boundaries changing (for example all lottery, or free for all) wouldn't lead to a lot of busing. And of course these fail the realistic requirement.[/quote] What's your point? That things might change, or they might stay the same?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
