Reply to School Boundaries and "One Fairfax"

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "School Boundaries and "One Fairfax""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote][b]Because Strauss floated moving parts of the McLean district that are in Providence and Hunter Mill, and not just Dranesville[/b], to Langley. She got out ahead of herself, and Palchik in particular (who also wanted a boundary study involving Shrevewood ES to move forward) pushed back. Brabrand didn't really have a position about Strauss's proposal from early 2019.

Blame everything on One Fairfax if you want, but it's an oversimplification.
[/quote]

Would that be to get more FARMS?  Wouldn't that be OneFairfax?  After all, aren't McLean parts of Dranesville much closer?  [/quote]

She'd said in work sessions well before One Fairfax was adopted in 2017 that, if there were to be any boundary study involving the two schools, she would not want to see the demographic gap between the two schools increased.  [/quote]

This concept is stupid. The Poor's may be able to go to mclean or langley for a few years but the price of houses will increase and the Poor's won't be able to afford it and you'll be back in the same place. Get over it, poor people won't be able to attend McLean or Langley.[/quote]

"The Poor's" don't live in the increasingly expensive houses that are now being torn down, but thanks for playing. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics