Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Boundary Review Meetings"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Now I'd like GFCA to put out a letter about their Western High scenario. I am guessing they are the ones who put in the comment into the boundary tool about moving McNair and Coates into Herndon HS. Which is never going to happen.[/quote] Cute conspiracy theory. They don’t have a position on the school. Most people in great falls don’t care about the school because it doesn’t affect us directly. There are a few people who question the costs for the school, just like the school board members have done recently.[/quote] Didn't they put out a letter saying it should be a magnet school? Or was that just the Nextdoor lady?[/quote] Glad you asked, the group that put out a letter saying it should be a magnet school was a Democratic Party-aligned group not based in Great Falls. I assume you’ll now spend significant amount of time attacking the democratically-aligned organization with the same vigor with which you attack great falls, right? Right? [/quote] Herrity’s GOP piece claiming the western HS is not needed was ghost written by a Great Falls resident. https://fairfaxgop.org/hundreds-of-millions-for-a-new-high-school-we-dont-need/[/quote] IDK who wrote that. Herrity added in Herndon which distorts the numbers and included modulars [2005 installs at Chantilly and Centreville] for the other schools. Using the CIP28-29 Langley 2285+ SY24-25 Spring Hill Island 201-2485. Divide by program capacity 106%, design 105%. There are concurrent and uncoordinated boundary processes at play: 1. comprehensive which has the BRAC 2, Poe as an AAP center. FCPS scoped it to include CIP projected membership which makes Poe 109% capacity utilization. That excludes the Thru/Reid/BRAC add in of 72 Poe base school students. Vote is 12/18. 3. Western HS- that should have been on scenario 4. AP comprehensive HS that includes some extra STEM POS. No magnet. 4. AAP centers at all MS - this should have been done for scenario 4 especially considering the huge volume of AAP transfers into Rocky Run and Carson. Recently R Anderson asked about the gr 6-8 at other MS. Reid stated not possible with AAP served in house at base schools. BRAC members, added non pyramid reps, Fairfax County Fed of citizens associations I guess you have to check where each lives plus any FCPS advisory committee roles. Who benefits from what? Failed blockade attempt on AAP in all MS [only NO vote was Meren whose South Lakes has a huge benefit from Herndon]: https://e0ff9d40-649b-4488-a1e0-677cf444a6de.filesusr.com/ugd/8bf868_5ebff0a2e8ef4d2eb2604f707fce5c34.pdf The report you can read mentioned in the position paper dealt with cluster grouping, honors classes, critical mass. Completely ignored the massive numbers transferring. Failed blockade attempt on Western as a comprehensive HS: https://e0ff9d40-649b-4488-a1e0-677cf444a6de.filesusr.com/ugd/8bf868_d128de909f284981a476bef5d4429396.pdf [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics