Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Consolidated VA Elections Thread"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Do you mean the long thread titled “CRT s not being taught in VA schools!” in which no one can even agree on a definition, let alone provide examples? [/quote] Plenty of examples on that thread and all the people supporting CRT say is "liar" and "racist." There is another thread about liberals concerned with identity politics, in which all the liberals who don't like identity politics are told they are liars and racists. On Twitter, you can fond many discussions of CRT where Ibram Kendi himself says his opponents are lying pr being racist. I can pretty much guarantee that Youngkin voters are quite aware of what CRT is and that they themselves are considered lying, racist or stupid. If CRT didn't get them, then their "stupidity" for thinking schools should have opened earlier or that parents should have a say in education did. It's really long passed the time to be pretending everybody is stupid, lying, or racist except you. [/quote] Pretending? :lol: Ok. If it’s so obvious what the definition is and so easy to provide examples of that happening in VA, please share. You can copy and paste from those posts. [/quote] DP. JFC. Can you not read? There is a post right here that copied directly from the VA Dept. of Education. They set the curriculum in VA. This is the BS they are pushing. Teachers are trained using these "resources" and are expected to incorporate them into the classroom. What about this do you not understand? Are you really this dumb?[/quote] That isn’t the definition of CRT. Still waiting on that… [/quote] Oh - we're dealing with Literals again. No critical thinking skills, whatsoever. The definition of CRT has been posted here many times, you simply choose to ignore it. The training materials used in FCPS are derived directly from CRT. If YOU don't understand what CRT is, I suggest you do some research of your own. Plenty of info on your google machine.[/quote] Right. So if it were THAT easy you’d easily be able to copy/paste or link to “the definition” no problem. But you haven’t… There is a 40+ page thread debating the definition and examples. You guys can’t even settle on your new definition. [/quote] If you had actually read the entire thread, you'd have seen the definition posted and reposted. So either you're too lazy to read it all, or too dumb to understand what you're reading. I can't help you with either issue.[/quote] I have read this whole thread and seen various opinions of what “the definition” is (beyond the law theory). Again, if it’s so easy to define you could it. [/quote] Go look up Kendi’s Atlantic article, also I believe there’s a recording of his presentation to FCPS[/quote] Yes, I’ve read that many times. Quoted it here, in fact. That’s not a definition of (non-law) CRT. [/quote] Whelp, I guess it is time for you to go back to primary school under the bridge, troll.[/quote] Well, like I said before… There are just enough hints of truth in misinformation to make it believable - that’s why it’s so effective. [/quote] Alternatively, it's pretty close to the truth and you can't find any actual mistakes, so you'll just make an unsupported claim.[/quote] I’m not making a claim. I’m asking the people who are making a claim to back it up. I’ve heard all sorts of things as you try to spin this. Make up your collective minds with this new definition. Was it teaching redlining? Was it forcing kids to line up by race? Is it discussing any form of racism? It’s it banning “I Am Rosa Parks” children’s book? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics