Reply to DC United Academy - aa strong academy or not

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to " DC United Academy - aa strong academy or not"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]please note. 2010s lost to 2009s and 2011s lost to 2010s. I don't care about how it fits into the argument, but present all the facts.

If this is true, this argument about wins/ losses is stupid. [/quote]

WRONG.  [b]The truly elite talent in our area was, in many instances, already playing up before they came to DCU.  The top talent in our area should be completely fine playing a year up against local clubs.  [/b]The fact that you're saying otherwise shows you know nothing about our area or the talent in our area. Just stick to cutting up the oranges after the game...better use of your time.  [/quote]

The paradox is that those DCU kids are probably the most physical mature for their age which may be why they are playing up.

Regardless, with "professional" training, I would expect my child in any professional academy to develop at 125%-150% of a P2P player in MLS Next.  If that is not happening, I am assessing my players work ethic.  If they are putting in the work, then I am assessing the training environment.  [/quote]

DCU is not the only club recruiting early bloomers.  SYC is guilty too if you look at certain age groups.  Let's not deny clubs aren't favoring early developers.  They think they can quickly train soccer skills to these players.

Keep seeing people parroting what they've heard about the massive sizes of dcu academy players, yet neither in real life nor in photos does this match the urban legend [/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics