Reply to All the boundary options are bad for the DCC-- how do we organize against that? (Any ideas for alternative options?)

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "All the boundary options are bad for the DCC-- how do we organize against that? (Any ideas for alternative options?) "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s all innuendo and rumor.  This board is pretty baseless frequently.[/quote]

You don't need DCUM to look at the second round options and see quite clearly who is being catered to and who is being screwed over.[/quote]

The dcc seems far far more upset about the regional programs than the boundaries.[/quote]

Quoting the OP:
[quote]Looking at the boundary options, it's pretty clear that all 4 of them benefit BCC, WJ, and Whitman at the expense of DCC schools. Their boundaries barely change (except WJ which gets Woodward as basically a WJ overflow school) whereas DCC boundaries change a lot. They have almost no split articulation (just Garrett Park and Kensington-Parkwood) while DCC schools have tons. Some DCC schools will remain overcrowded in some of these options, but their schools will not. It seems like they basically decided to give those schools everything they want and then let DCC families argue amongst ourselves for or against certain options that benefit some DCC neighborhoods and schools more than others.[/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics