Reply to FFRDCs

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "FFRDCs"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Senior researchers are a dime a dozen. It's much harder to find folks with technical skills who want to work at a non-profit instead of Google.  I know RAND looks at comparable salaries when setting ranges.[/quote]

How do you know? Is RAND HR monitoring this thread?[/quote]

I used to work there as a researcher. Definitely not HR.  FFRDCs to do comps pretty carefully when doing government work to justify salaries.  What can researchers make in academia?  What do other organizations pay? That said the comps are not Wall Street.

It was always harder to find folks for the tech support side, and hard to keep them.  In Silicon Valley they're the stars and at FFRDCs they are make it possible for researchers to do their work.

I know folks at all the local FFRDCs. Mostly really smart and mission driven people.  A lot of them could have made more money in other organizations.    [/quote]

Not sure I buy this point. The pay range for a "Technical AI Policy Associate" at RAND is listed at $47,100- $156,500, requiring a BA but preference for a higher degree. (https://rand.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/External_Career_Site/job/Washington-DC-DC-Metro-Area/Technical-AI-Policy-Associate_R3217-1)

RAND is paying a "Grants Proposal Manager" between $75,700-$112,400, requiring a high school diploma but a BA is preferred. (https://rand.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/External_Career_Site/job/Washington-DC/Grants-Proposal-Manager_R3234)

That difference is absurd. In what world does a grant proposal manager with a HS diploma get paid up to 50%+ LESS than a Technical AI policy researcher? This is the kind of thing DOGE should be digging into - it's waste and bloat hiding in plain sight!

[/quote]

*Correction: That difference is absurd. In what world does a grant proposal manager with a HS diploma get paid up to 50%+ MORE than a Technical AI policy researcher? This is the kind of thing DOGE should be digging into - it's waste and bloat hiding in plain sight!
[/quote]

The AI position isn't even government funded. And if they underpay, they won't get good people. Why would that be your business,.or DOGE's? [/quote]

Based on a link in the job posting by PP, it looks like the position is located in what is called the "Technology and Security Policy Center" that seems to be funded by a lot of non-government donors: https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/technology-and-security-policy/funding.html

Why is this DOGE's business? Surely there are conflict of interest clauses in RAND's sole-sourced government contracts. It's the primary reason why RAND gets to hold these very high-dollar value, sole-sourced contracts. Unless these positions at RAND are located in a subsidiary that is completely independent from these sole-sourced contracts, it is definitely something that government auditors would (and probably should) be looking into. Based on my quick perusing of rand.org it seems like they are jumbling together their work from their sole-sourced contracts with the other non-government funded activities.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics