Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "2024 JonBenet Documentary"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m looking forward to finding out the truth about this murder. UMC/wealthy white people don’t murder their kids. Really, they don’t. Some lower MC white men kill their spouses, but even that is rare and they end up on the national news. People who commit crimes also typically have a criminal history. Wherever there is smoke there is fire. No way that this family would be so successful without any family history or criminal activity and then one day they murder their only daughter. This case garnered a lot of interest because it’s a wealthy family and people like to eat the rich. [/quote] First of all, if you watch any crime stuff on Netflix etc. UMC/wealthy people absolutely do murder their family. Second of all, abuse certainly occurs within wealthy families as well. Thirdly, wealthy people are certainly not immune to psychiatric problems and developmental disorders. Lastly, the most plausible theory in this case is not that one of her parents killed her. It’s that her brother, who very likely had an untreated psychiatric disorder, is the one who attacked and ultimately killed her - whether it was intentional or premeditated or not. The parents (primarily the mother) covered it up and they got away with it because they were wealthy enough to hire top lawyers and publicists and interfere with the DA. [/quote] I know you think you have it all figured out but there are too many holes in that theory to make it so obvious to many which is why the parents have never been arrested nor the boy.[/quote] I don’t think I have it all figured out. It’s just a lot more rational than thinking an intruder did it and lingered in the house for hours while JB hemorrhaged to death, taking their time to defile her body with toys and paintbrushes from the basement and other materials that patsy had purchased from stores, and ultimately write several drafts of a long ransom note with materials in the kitchen. Not to mention feeding jonbenet pineapple shortly before all of this, staging an abduction after she was already dead, the fact that patsy was still in her clothes and makeup from the night before and that Burke was heard on the 911 call despite the parents claiming he was asleep. The most logical explanation is that the family was involved. We will never know exactly what happened unless Burke talks someday, which he won’t. Burke also likely does not know exactly what his mother did to cover it up. [/quote] I agree with you. There is just too much circumstantial evidence against the family. If it was an was up eating pineapple in the middle of the night with her brother coincidentally , and the intruder was able to find all these murder and ransom note supplies around the house without leaving any fingerprints or hairs or other touch DNA, and Patsy happened to just put on the same clothes as last night when she woke up? Like it could have happened this way- no one knows!- but man that’s a lot of coincidence [/quote] OK, different poster but this one fact has always bothered the crap out of me. Patsy putting on the same clothes the night after. I’m sorry, but I do that all the freaking time. And I’m not unhygienic or weird. But let’s think about Patsy‘s day. It was Christmas the day before and the family probably got up and went to church and opened presents. They went to dinner at a friends that evening. She probably put on a fresh outfit before they went to dinner. They were at dinner around three or four hours. Went home and went to bed. It is completely in the realm of possibility that if I go out to a friends for dinner for three or four hours in the sweater and the top or whatever, that I would then get up the next morning and head to the airport in the same sweater or top. Sorry, I know that is a small detail, but it really bothers me that think this is such strange behavior. There was a Twitter thread on this phenomenon a few years ago, I believe the actress Mindy Kaling started it - she called on people to share pictures of their “clothes chair.” The chair that you throw clothes on that you wore that are not dirty enough to be laundered, but you don’t want to put away cause you need to wear them again so you can wash them. I remember it so well because I shared it with my husband because I have the same damn thing and it drives him crazy. And I showed him all of the pictures of the women who were sharing their clothes chair. So maybe some people think it’s gross and maybe you don’t do this and maybe you think it’s a bad habit, but I will say is very common for women to do this. [/quote] She said she got up and went down the stairs to make coffee. They were planning to travel that day. It doesn’t seem odd that she threw on whatever (from the clothes chair of which I have one too), to get the coffee going before heading back up to get ready for the day. I don’t appear in the kitchen fully showered, dressed, coiffed, with full makeup and ready for the day and I bet most people don’t either. It is a weird detail to get hung up on. But people are so desperate to blame the parents they either make up their own facts or make weird pronouncements like this one.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics