Reply to If you could know the truth about any unsolved mystery, which would it be?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "If you could know the truth about any unsolved mystery, which would it be?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I feel like Burke accidentally whacking JB too hard is most likely scenario, but what trips me up here is the staging of the body afterward.  I can maybe see the parent(s) applying the duct tape and wrist ties... but not the business with the garotte and the paintbrush, nor can I see a little kid Burke's age coming up with that.  I just can't picture loving parents doing that to their child even as part of staging a crime scene.[/quote]

I just watched the first episode and it doesn’t add up. Her wrists were not lightly bound; but very tight. Those neck wounds from the garret (which took quite a bit of skill). She was alive when the garter was made (her hair was caught in it) and the neck torture occurred at about the same time as the head trauma. The autopsy tells a story of torture, not an accidental wack on the head after she stole a piece of Burke’s pineapple or a “cover up.” Patsy comes across as a complete liar and the Fad comes across as innocent-ish. Burke is clearly autistic but that doesn’t make him a psychopath. I would pick Patsy if it wasn’t for the sexual assault with the paintbrush. It had to be the Dad.[/quote]

And the fact that the police got the DNA results that exonerated all three Ramseys and suppressed that? That DNA was found under her fingernails and on her underwear that belonged to an unidentified male? And that Boulder police planted stories with friendly reporters that were fake implying the Ramseys did it?

[/quote]

Do you have more info about the DNA? I had read that it was “touch DNA” that could have been from whoever manufactured the underwear, and that it was not enough to make the police think anyone else had really touched  her body [/quote]

Under her fingernails too?

The police were obsessed with explaining away the DNA and tried to trace it back to the manufacturer. But how would that have gotten under her nails? [/quote]

I don’t know, that’s why I’m asking if you read anything different. I didn’t read that it was this large amount of DNA or even that it was skin under her nails. Just the same touch DNA which I read could have been just from her putting on the new underwear with her hands. But I don’t know of course. [/quote]

You would then have to believe that Patsy put those panties on JB for the first time ever that night and without washing them. That’s ridiculous. [/quote]

The child wet the bed late at night, she grabbed the new panties to put on her in haste. Doesn't seem at all weird to me.[/quote]

But the photos of the bed taken by the cops show that the bed had been slept in, and that the sheets were dry.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics