Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "DEI at Michigan--NYT article"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why are some people here taking the "rebuttal" (a blog post by a subject who comes off badly in the article) at face value as the Gospel truth? The Times article was extensively edited and fact checked. If we're assigning weights to things, it's probably more reliable.[/quote] Did you read it? NYT did not properly fact check. [/quote] What are some wires it made besides cutting Heritage?[/quote] *What are some errors it made besides citing Heritage?[/quote] So you didn’t read the rebuttal? Start there. [/quote] You mean the rebuttal from the DEI exec herself? Telling us all what a wonderful job she did? No conflict of interest there. How about an unbiased rebuttal?[/quote] Did you read it? She presents facts. [/quote] Carefully selected facts. She is not going to evaluate herself honestly. Come on. If an outsider would like to speak up for her I would be much more interested but this is all CYA.[/quote] Do you think it was ok for the NYT to omit the facts she presented? [/quote] Do you realized that this is how it works? Facts are omitted on both sides to present the narrative you want to tell.[/quote] Right. And she called out the facts that were blatantly omitted. Do you think they should have been included? Or maybe are you good with the narrative that the NYT was crafting. [/quote] Sorry that you thought a rebuttal by DEI exec defending herself was some sort of mic drop moment.[/quote] You have no idea what it was since you didn’t read it. [/quote] Like the people who stopped reading the NYT article a few paragraphs in when they saw something they didn’t like? Hm.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics