Reply to NYT story: Trump administration could strike abortion almost immediately using Comstock law

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "NYT story: Trump administration could strike abortion almost immediately using Comstock law"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]LOL, at the embarrassingly stupid ‘slave’ analogy.

These are the frighteningly dumb people who don't understand not every woman got pregnant during a one night stand and treats abortion like birth control and goes to a clinic and gets a card punched and the 12th abortion is free, or that every woman even WANTED the abortion. [/quote]

98% of abortions in the US are elective. There was no rape or incest, no medical problems for either mother or baby.[/quote]

It’s none of your business WHY a woman chooses to have an abortion and your BS 98% claim is laughable because women don’t announce the reason they’re having an abortion. You think there’s a form you fill out where you fully explain the reason? You have no damn idea why most women have one. You have no idea about their situation.None. You appear to just think the worst of women who’ve had one. You think every woman was just careless, having sec with every random guy who looks in her direction and oopsie, she got pregnant. So let’s have this careless nympho bring a baby into the world![/quote]

Everyone who pays taxes has a right to voice their opinion about the things their taxes pay for.[/quote]

Look up Hyde amendment, dumbass.[/quote]

During the 2020 presidential campaign, Joe Biden reversed his previous support of the Hyde Amendment and pledged to work to overturn it if elected.[34] In 2021, he introduced a 2022 budget that completely omitted the Hyde Amendment.[34][35]
A Labor, Health and Human Services bill unveiled in 2021 excluded the amendment.[36] However, the amendment was reinserted into the federal budget that was passed in March 2022. [37]
206 Democrats voted for the spending bill; 15 against it.[38] As reported in Roll Call, “Democrats voted overwhelmingly for the nondefense portion of the omnibus.” House Appropriations Chair Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn...."expressed frustration over her party's concession on Hyde [retaining it in the final passed omnibus bill]. She said she's the ‘first appropriations chair since 1977 to remove it because I understand that this is an offensive and discriminatory policy which has shut out countless women from the reproductive health care that they deserve for more than 40 years.’”[39]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Amendment

Why are democrats fighting hard to get rid of Hyde?
[/quote]

Why are republicans working hard to bring back THE COMSTOCK ACT WHICH IS WHAT THIS THREAD IS ABOUT.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics