Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Virginia couple sued by Afghan refugees of crazy scheme to kidnap their baby"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^ Forgot to add that there is a whole political issue that is also a huge factor. The baby's parents were killed on or around September 5, 2019. A few months before this was the time when the US was negotiating a withdrawal with the Taliban. The talks between U.S. special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad and top Taliban official Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar centered on the United States withdrawing its troops from Afghanistan in exchange for the Taliban pledging to block international terrorist groups from operating on Afghan soil. So the position of the US and Taliban was that there weren't foreign fighters yet villagers and Army rangers say there were. So it was in the interest of officials on both sides to say a baby found was not foreign but Afghani. This is also why DNA testing needs to be done. [/quote] The only evidence that this was the child of fighters and not the farmers seems to come from Mast himself. The farmer's family doesn't agree. The villagers don't agree. The young girl who claims to have dropped her brother doesn't agree. We know that Mast is a child trafficker who lied under oath. Why would we believe him about this. But even if somehow there was a mistake. Maybe the family living on the other side of the wall also had a baby, and she's the one who survived, while the farmer's baby actually died. That baby is still Afghan, because the fighters arrived in 2017, and the baby was clearly not born then. Afghan law says that a child born in Afghanistan with stateless or unknown parents is Afghan. So, the baby is Afghan, and the Afghan government can choose who will raise her. As for your "but she has light skin" theory, I'll offer these pictures of Afghan children from Unicef. https://www.unicef.org/emergencies/delivering-support-afghanistans-children [/quote] It doesn't matter if the child has blond hair and blue eyes. It doesn't matter if the parents were farmers or fighters. The baby did not have parents. She was in Afghanistan. She thereby had to be of Afghan descent. Therefore under Afghan law she goes to a family member OR another muslim Afghan family. The Masts, or any other American, or any other nonAfghan have absolutely no valid claim. None. End of story. So we don't need dna or to talk about hair and skin color. IT IS IRRELEVANT.[/quote] AP investigated and interviewed villagers who said foreign fighters who were light skinned recently had moved into the village. So did an Army ranger who states that he was there with Afghan forces. The Afghan forces stated they were not Afghani. At that time there were foreign fighters from Tajikistan helping the Taliban. Something the US didn’t want because the peace agreement that was being negotiated at that time forbade foreign Al Queda militants from being in Afghanistan. The Mast absolutely shouldn’t have taken her so I am not siding with them. I want the truth and am skeptical of why the Afghani couple is refusing to take a DNA test. I am from South America where so many babies were stolen during the years Chile and Argentina were run by dictators. The only way families have been able to figure out is who their biological family is by DNA testing. Enough doubt exists in the case that it absolutely should be done. She could be not Afghani but Her family could be from Tajikistan or somewhere else. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics