Reply to Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I have lost respect for all three branches of our government, and their bastardization of the Constitution.  [/quote]

Isn't it horrifying how one man can wreck all of our institutions because...of his strong personality?

It's pitiful.  The Supreme Court is pititful.  [/quote]

No one has been charged let alone convicted of insurrection.  [/quote]

So?

Here is the text of the Fourteenth Amendment (it doesn't say anything about being charged or convicted):

Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.[/quote]

So what you are saying is I can just say Joe Biden is an insurrectionist?  Or do will have some other steps.[/quote] It goes like this:  Texas declares Biden an insurrectionist for providing aid and comfort to migrants coming across the boarder who are terrorists and he's off the Texas ballot. Add NM and AZ. Now it's almost mathmatically impossible for him to win since he'll lose all those votes.[/quote]

Do you think this is the first case to interpret a law? If an idiot judge makes an idiotic ruling it is appealed and overturned.

The Supreme Court should interpret the 14th amendment but they are too chickenshit to do that so they are going to say that everyone just needs to ignore this inconvenient paragraph in the Constitution. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics