Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Shooting at Brandywine & Connecticut Ave NW This Afternoon"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It seems some possible policy solutions are: 1. Limiting the number/percentage of voucher holders per building. This is to stem destabilization. If non-voucher residents move out, the problem magnifies as landlords fill more and more units and create private public housing. 2. Ensure that vouchers pay landlord what existing tenants pay and not an amount above that. This would end market distortions for the rental market and temper the incentives for landlord. The main incentive would instead be filling vacant units, not garnering as much profit as possible. The profit is coming from taxpayer dollars. 3. Require that voucher holders participate in relevant support programs 4. Ending the musical chairs of sending people who have been kicked out of one building to another down the street. [/quote] All good ideas Cheh attempted #1, no go. This was also discussed in the WP article about the voucher disaster on Quincy Street in this thread. HUD audit and tens of millions in fines did not accomplish 2. Since there is a higher likelihood of property damage or need to pay for eviction proceedings, that has been used at times as an excuse. 3 is explicitly not allowed by HUD. 4 would be fab, as would revoking vouchers for behavior that would get someone kicked out of public housing. "Private" de facto public housing should follow the same rules. A tenant of Section 8 housing can be evicted for the following reasons: Repeated or serious lease violations Conducting illegal activities on or near the property The unit isn't safe and fails to meet health and safety standards Nonreporting of household members and their income Criminal activity[/quote] Yes, similar guidelines would be useful. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics