Reply to Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Gwyneth Paltrow court case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I never understood the need people seem to have to be supplicants to a celebrity. Yet, it’s so evident.

She sent a text. The other side has multiple in the aftermath corroborating their story.

She has no injuries. He has documented and consistent injuries.

She had no eyewitnesses despite skiing with 11 people — one of whom skied down, identified her to the other party, and was her instructor and whose job was to watch GP. Yet that person, the children, the other instructors are not testifying. In my opinion in order not to perjure themselves under the pressure from GP. He had the only eyewitness who has told a consistent story.

Her story is not feasible. She’s out to destroy what’s left of this man and bankrupt him, all the way flaunting her wealth though the animations and treats for the bailiffs and clothing. It’s a disgusting display of the wealth gap and the new oligarch America.

It’s clear as day who has the evidence. You just dot believe him because he’s an old guy who’s not known or pretty.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics