Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Arlington Missing Middle Housing Q&A"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Missing Middle is the ultimate pro-developer policy. I wasn't aware that wanting to line the pockets of developers was a policy stance of Democrats?[/quote] How is missing middle more pro-developer than current policy? Isn’t the ability to tear down an old home and construct a mcmansion also pro-developer? [/quote] If you can build at about the same cost, but sell 3 units at $1m each instead of 1 at $2m, which makes a better profit? Remember that you as the developer do not have to incur any costs related to overcrowded schools, lack of park and recreation space, or additional vehicles parked on the street. [/quote] But we can agree that both current policy and MMH benefit developers, yes? If MMH opponents are anti-developer then why aren’t they arguing against all tear downs? Or arguing in favor of increasing setbacks? It’s like you’re pro-developer in some cases and anti-developer in others, but the reality is you don’t actually care about developers or affordable housing or the tree canopy. You care about your property value and now that you’ve got yours, exclusion is your priority.[/quote] Proponents of MMH keep telling us that MMH will increase property values, which I believe. I also believe it will result in gentrification. So PO’s argument that opponents of MMH are “pro-developer in some cases and anti-developer in others, but the reality is you don’t actually care about developers or affordable housing or the tree canopy. You care about your property value and now that you’ve got yours, exclusion is your priority.” DOESN’T make any sense. [/quote] The pandemic also showed me some major flaws in the APS schools. A number of late teen to early 20 kids returned to our neighborhood because their schools were closed or they were laid off from jobs. It was surprising to me that many of their parents had Ivy League or top state university educations but they were going to mediocre schools and not even doing well. The ones that managed to get through some college had jobs that were fairly dead end, like restaurant servers or low level office jobs. The parents paid a lot of money to live in Arlington for schools, but the schools didn't deliver for these kids. Many of them are still at home, and the only one I think survived well was one girl who dropped out of college and started a lawn service. She found some laid off construction workers and started with them cutting lawns. Then when they were called back to work, she had their cousins, brothers, friends continue the work and added things like tree and shrubbery trimming, and gutter cleaning. My DH set up her books for her because she had no concept of how to run a business. Her mom -- a retired Fed lawyer -- is now her bookkeeper. [/quote] It's good that you've acknowledged that APS are not up to par. For the amount of wealth in the county, it is pretty shocking how mediocre the schools are. People on this board get unnecessarily defensive when this issue is raised, which is unfortunate, because denial of the problem doesn't help the situation.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics