Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]No, it isn’t. If life is devalued because it requires the assistance of others to be sustained, then it doesn’t matter what form that assistance takes. Otherwise, you are arguing that it is not okay to burden one body but it is okay to burden another body. [/quote] So you agree with the devil’s handmaiden that pregnancy and birth take no physical, emotional and mental toll on a woman’s body, nor does it affect her financial position? Just how disposable do you think children are that you think they can just be grown and disposed of, left to some nutter to do god knows what to? You like to think you’re advocating for being compassionate and caring, when the reality is that you’re advocating bodily slavery in the name of someone else’s religion, based on that other religion’s beliefs about ensoulment and gender politics, to say nothing of what happens in a lot of adoptive homes. That’s a unique torture you want to commit upon women. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
