Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Help me understand the impact of a $15 minimum wage? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm curious if those who are against the increase feel there shouldn't be a minimum wage at all? And why or why not?[/quote] My personal opinion: it should be left to the states and local areas. WV and NYC are two very different economies and cost of living. What is necessary for survival in NYC is quite different than WV. However, a few Senators have a proposal to raise it slowly--and, I don't think it is to $15. It would not start until after the pandemic is over--which is very wise. You don't put people out of jobs when jobs are scarce. It would be tied to inflation.[/quote] That’s the status quo. The federal minimum is a floor. Most states have a higher wage. Raising the floor is what we are talking about. And the jobs that pay it right now, may nor even be coming back anyway. It’s an interesting time to think outside of the box on wages and the workforce. Raising the federal minimu to 15 covers the half of the low-wage work force that makes more than federal minimu but less than 15. Those jobs are probably not as easily cut as the lowest wage jobs anyway. But paying those workers more may offset some of the losses experienced at the lowest end.[/quote] Raising the minimum wage is not thinking outside of the box. There is nothing new about minimum wage. [b]Increasing wages without increasing productivity[/b] will simply lead to inflation. This is simple economics. The federal minimum wage did not impact inflation in the past precisely because it affected only a very small number of people. But if you now suddenly apply it to 30% of the workforce, its impacts on unemployment and inflation will be substantial. I find it ironic that you think it's a good idea for the federal government to set a "floor" that is higher or equal to all existing state minimum wage levels. That's some floor. [/quote] You are oversimplifying by a lot. We've got an almost feudalistic economy going right now, where workers are not actually reaping the benefits of increases in productivity over the past several decades. Almost all of that wealth has accrued to the top fraction of the 1%. Our economy is so balkanized, that I don't really think that you can easily apply economic theories that assume a different economic structure. A substantial increase in the minimum wage may not, in fact, lead to the level of inflation that Econ 101 might have suggested, because it might just readjust a situation where people are getting goods from charities or buying on credit to buying those goods for themselves (i.e. it may not lead to as large of a demand increase as you might expect). I don't really know what the right answer is, but paying people a living wage seems like a good start. If there are economic consequences to that policy, then we can deal with them when they come along. But arguing for the status quo, where the majority of Americans are living hand-to-mouth and also dying in debt at the same time that the two richest men to ever have lived (and that includes one guy who almost halved his net worth in a divorce) are also Americans seems pretty f'ed up and also not good for the economy.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics