Reply to 75,000 Pro-Gun Demonstrators in Richmond For "Lobby Day"?

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "75,000 Pro-Gun Demonstrators in Richmond For "Lobby Day"?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's not about racism. It's about keeping guns out of the hands of people who can't pass background checks. I wonder how many sex offenders are in that crowd. I don't care what color they are.[/quote]

Or domestic abusers. 
[/quote]

Domestic abusers have been federally prohibited from owning a gun since 1994. It's  called the Lautenberg Amendment. Google it.

You don't even realize you're demanding things that have already existed longer than most millennials, lolz!

Seriously, get a clue. [/quote]

Huh? The “clue” is that there are big gaps.

Since you want to protect people from domestic abusers you must fully support:

EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDER ACT OF 2019 (H.R. 1236 AND S. 506)
https://www.bradyunited.org/legislation/extreme-risk-protection-order-act-of-2019-h-r-1236-and-s-506

[/quote]

Why won't they call it what it is: The Elimination of Due Process Act of 2020"

Because that's what red flag laws are - the elimination of lawful due process.

If you need to deprive someone of their rights, you can do so after they've been convicted of a disqualifying crime. Not just because they left a bad Yelp review about you:

https://www.app.com/story/news/local/public-safety/2019/11/22/gun-control-nj-red-flag-law-tested-case-between-middletown-man-and-doctor/4253289002/

This is why red flag laws will be abused. Because they were designed to be.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics