Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "APS: Think the "no move" campaign is going to work?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not a parent who will be impacted, but I keep wondering WHY APS doesn't know how many Key families would move if it moved to the ATS location. It seems pretty darn easy to survey the current K-4 families and ask. They aren't committed to whatever they choose, but APS could at least have a ballpark number. That's one piece of data that makes me feel like they are being a bit sloppy and have just dug into this position, regardless of whether this whole cascade is the right one. ASFS is vastly overcrowded, and I agree a building is needed, but APS is claiming not to know how many kids will stay behind. [/quote] The problem with doing a survey now is that you will get parents saying what they think will get them the best result vs. a real picture. If you want to keep Key on Key and they ask if you will move with the program, you say no, right? That doesn't mean that you won't move when the time comes.[/quote] [b]Also, some parents apparently don't understand the move, that there will be transportation and that the students currently at ATS are moving out. I know it sounds ridiculous; but some parents do not realize their kids will get a bus to school and think they are being added to the students at ATS. The strong AEM Key advocates keep talking ABOUT and TO these families to garner support and petition signatures; but apparently aren't doing much talking WITH them to make sure they know what really will happen. [/b] So, if you ask parents now, they may say "no" but when they realize these other things, they may say "yes." What APS DOES know is that for every student outside the Key/ASFS attendance zone transferred into Key, one neighborhood seat opens regardless of how many current students opt to stay at a neighborhood Key. I don't know the exact numbers; but 260 students currently attend Key from outside what the neighborhood attendance zone is, then a minimum of 260 seats open up when those students relocate with immersion to ATS. Even if they drop out, they go back to their own neighborhood schools and do not keep occupying a seat in the new Key neighborhood school. It is most unlikely that nobody within the attendance zone will move with the program; so a lot more seats than just those 260 become available for neighborhood seats. Compare that to not moving the program: zero neighborhood seats open up. [/quote] There is a lot of misinformation that those who oppose it are using to advance their arguments. One person fighting the McKinley move because it would move them to Ashlawn objected because they didn't want their child going from one overcrowded school to another, citing the % over capacity numbers of current Ashlawn. Completely missing that there is a step in-between -- redoing boundaries so the school WON'T be overcrowded. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics